Research Article | Open Access Volume 6 | Issue 03-4 | Paper 08 | https://doi.org/10.15228/ANST.2026.v06.i03-4.p08 |
Comparative Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Thrombolytic, and Hemolytic Activities of Aerva persica Leaf Extracts Obtained Using Different Solvents
Zainab Bibi
Department of Zoology, Wildlife & Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Saima Naz
Department of Chemistry, University of Education, Faisalabad Campus, Pakistan
Kanz ul Eman
Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, the Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
Fania Rashid
Department of Chemistry, Government College University Lahore, Pakistan
Ayeza Sana
Department of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Areeba Samin
Institute of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
Umme Rubab
Department of Chemistry, University of Education, Faisalabad Campus, Pakistan
Kiran Qamar
Department of Chemistry, University of Education, Faisalabad Campus, Pakistan
Shahzaib Ishfaq
Department of Chemistry, University of Education, Faisalabad Campus, Pakistan
| Received 04 May, 2026 | Accepted 18 Jun, 2026 | Published 25 Jun, 2026 |
ABSTRACT:
This study investigates the phytochemical profile and in vitro biological activities of Aerva persica leaf extracts obtained using solvents of varying polarity, including n-hexane, chloroform, 80% ethanol, n-butanol, and 80% methanol. Quantitative analysis revealed that the 80% ethanol extract contained the highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents, indicating superior extraction efficiency for antioxidant compounds. Among all tested samples, the 80% ethanol extract exhibited the strongest antioxidant potential, with the highest DPPH radical-scavenging activity (82.77%), notable reducing power, and inhibition of lipid peroxidation. Antimicrobial screening demonstrated significant antibacterial and antifungal effects, particularly in 80% ethanol extracts, with measurable zones of inhibition against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungal strains. The 80% ethanolic extract also showed the highest thrombolytic activity (45.72%), suggesting moderate clot-dissolving potential. Hemolytic assays indicated generally low cytotoxicity across extracts, with chloroform showing comparatively higher hemolysis. Overall, A. persica leaves represent a promising source of bioactive phytochemicals with antioxidant, antimicrobial, and thrombolytic potential for further pharmacological exploration.
Keywords: Biological activity, Thrombolytic activity, Hemolytic activity, Phenolics, Flavonoids, Antioxidant
How to Cite this paper?
APA-7 Style
Bibi Z., Naz S., Eman K., Rashid F., Sana A., Samin A., Rubab U., Qamar K., Ishfaq S., (2026) Comparative Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Thrombolytic, and Hemolytic Activities of Aerva persica Leaf Extracts Obtained Using Different Solvents Journal Advances of Nutrition Science and Technology, 6(3-4), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.15228/ANST.2026.v06.i03-4.p08
ACS Style
Z. Bibi, S. Naz, K. Eman, F. Rashid, A. Sana, A. Samin, U. Rubab, K. Qamar, S. Ishfaq, Comparative Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Thrombolytic, and Hemolytic Activities of Aerva persica Leaf Extracts Obtained Using Different Solvents Journal Advances of Nutrition Science and Technology, 6(3-4), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.15228/ANST.2026.v06.i03-4.p08
AMA Style
Z. Bibi; S. Naz; K. Eman; F. Rashid; A. Sana; A. Samin; U. Rubab; K. Qamar; S. Ishfaq; Comparative Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Thrombolytic, and Hemolytic Activities of Aerva persica Leaf Extracts Obtained Using Different Solvents Journal Advances of Nutrition Science and Technology, 6(3-4), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.15228/ANST.2026.v06.i03-4.p08
Chicago/Turabian Style
Z Bibi, S Naz, K Eman, F Rashid, A Sana, A Samin, U Rubab, K Qamar, S Ishfaq, Comparative Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Thrombolytic, and Hemolytic Activities of Aerva persica Leaf Extracts Obtained Using Different Solvents (2026) Journal Advances of Nutrition Science and Technology, 6(3-4), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.15228/ANST.2026.v06.i03-4.p08
